Home / Current Affairs

Criminal Law

Compoundable and Non-Compoundable Offences

    «
 09-Jan-2025

H. N. Pandakumar v. The State of Karnataka

“Supreme Court: Grievous Hurt by Dangerous Weapons (S.326 IPC) Can Be Settled in Exceptional Cases.”

Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Prasanna B. Varale

Source: Supreme Court  

Why in News? 

The Supreme Court allowed a compromise in a non-compoundable offence under Section 326 IPC, which deals with grievous hurt by dangerous weapons. Instead of the  non-compoundable, the Court invoked its inherent powers, citing exceptional circumstances like a voluntary settlement and the complainant's consent.  

  • Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Prasanna B. Varale  held in the matter of H. N. Pandakumar v. The State of Karnataka 

What was the Background of H. N. Pandakumar v. The State of Karnataka? 

  • H.N. Pandakumar (accused) was involved in a criminal case stemming from FIR filed at K.R. Pete Rural Police Station, Mandya. 
  • The original complaint was filed by Puttaraju, alleging that five accused persons formed an unlawful assembly and assaulted him and his family members, causing grievous injuries. 
  • Based on the investigation, charges were framed against all accused under multiple sections including 143, 341, 504, 323, 324, and 307 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code,1860. 
  • The Trial Court, through its judgment dated 24th January 2012 in Sessions Court, convicted Accused Nos. 3 and 4 under Section 326 read with Section 34 IPC.  
  • They were sentenced to:  
    • Two years of rigorous imprisonment 
    • Fine of Rs. 2,000/- each 
    • The remaining accused were acquitted 
  • Pandakumar appealed to the Karnataka High Court’s judgment dated 01th September,2023:  
    • Reduced his sentence to one year 
    • Enhanced the fine to Rs. 2,00,000/- 
    • Acquitted Accused No. 4 
  • After his Special Leave Petition was dismissed by the Supreme Court on 19th January 2024. 
  • Pandakumar filed a Miscellaneous Application seeking to compound the offence based on:  
    • A compromise reached between the parties 
    • Agreement to pay Rs. 5,80,000/- as compensation 
    • Resolution of all disputes including property matters 
    • The fact that both parties are distantly related and live in close proximity 
  • The complainant filed an Interlocutory Application supporting the compromise and seeking closure of the matter. 

What were the Court’s Observations? 

  • The Supreme Court acknowledged that while Section 326 IPC (punishment for grievous hurt by dangerous weapons) is non-compoundable under the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, the Court possesses inherent powers to give effect to compromise in exceptional circumstances. 
  • The Court noted several significant factors that constituted exceptional circumstances in this case:  
    • The existence of an amicable settlement between parties 
    • The complainant's unequivocal consent documented through the Interlocutory Application 
    • The parties' residential proximity (separated only by a road) 
    • The distant familial relationship between the parties 
  • The potential impact of continued hostility on the social fabric of the neighborhood 
  • The comprehensive nature of the compromise covering both criminal and property disputes 
  • The resolution of long-standing right of way issues 
  • The Court recognized that the applicant/petitioner's commitment to paying the agreed compensation (Rs. 5,80,000/-) demonstrated a genuine effort to resolve the discord. 
  • The Court states that the complainant's support for the compromise through a formal Interlocutory Application provides the voluntary nature of the settlement. 
  • Based on these exceptional circumstances, the Court determined it appropriate to:  
    • Allow the Miscellaneous Application 
    • Recall the previous order dated 19th January 2024 dismissing the SLP 
    • Grant leave 
    • Confirm the conviction while reducing the sentence to the period already undergone 
  • The Court disposed of the Interlocutory Application for impleadment in terms of this order, along with any other pending applications. 

What is Section 326 of IPC? 

  • Section 326 IPC prescribes punishment for voluntarily causing grievous hurt using dangerous weapons or means, including any instrument for shooting/stabbing/cutting, fire, heated substances, poison, corrosive substances, explosive substances, deleterious substances, or by means of any animal. 
  • The punishment under Section 326 IPC can extend to imprisonment for life or imprisonment up to 10 years, along with a fine, except in cases covered under Section 335 IPC (grievous hurt on grave and sudden provocation). 
  • The essential elements required to constitute an offence under Section 326 IPC are:  
    • Voluntary causing of grievous hurt 
    • Use of any dangerous weapon or means as specified in the section 
    • Intent or knowledge of likelihood to cause grievous hurt by such means 

What are Compoundable and Non-Compoundable Offence? 

  • Compoundable Offences are those where the victim and the accused can mutually settle their dispute outside the court, with the court's permission, leading to the withdrawal of the criminal case - examples include simple hurt (Section 323 IPC), criminal breach of trust (Section 406 IPC), and defamation (Section 500 IPC). 
  • Non-compoundable Offences are those where compromise between parties is not legally permitted as these are considered serious crimes against society at large - examples include murder (Section 302 IPC), grievous hurt (Section 326 IPC), rape (Section 376 IPC), and kidnapping (Section 363 IPC). 
  • Section 320 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (Section 359 of BNSS) states lists which offences are compoundable and specifies whether they can be compounded with court permission or without court permission. 
  • The Supreme Court has held that while non-compoundable offences cannot ordinarily be compromised, the Court may use its inherent powers under Article 142 of the Constitution or Section 482 CrPC to allow compromise in exceptional circumstances, considering factors like the nature of the offence, background of the case, and extent of compromise between parties. 

What are the Differences Between Compoundable and Non-Compoundable Offence?

Aspect 

Compoundable Offences 

Non-Compoundable Offences 

1. Nature of Crime 

Less serious offences; primarily affecting individuals 

Serious offences; grave in nature 

2. Impact 

Affects only private parties/individuals 

Affects both individuals and society at large 

3. Case Filing 

Generally filed by private parties 

Filed by the state 

4. Withdrawal Option 

Charges can be withdrawn through compromise 

Charges cannot be withdrawn once filed 

5. Settlement 

Can be settled with or without court permission (as per Section 320 CrPC) 

Cannot be compounded; can only be quashed 

6. Compromise 

Legally permitted between parties 

Not allowed by law 

7. Court's Power 

Court has jurisdiction to add other charges 

Court lacks jurisdiction to add other charges 

8. Legal Procedure 

Can end through compromise between parties 

Must go through a complete trial process 

9. Examples 

• House trespass (Sec 448 IPC) • Criminal breach of contract (Sec 491 IPC) • Simple hurt (Sec 323 IPC) 

• Grievous hurt with weapons (Sec 324 IPC) • Rash driving (Sec 279 IPC) • Murder (Sec 302 IPC) 

10. Primary Focus 

Resolution and compromise between parties 

Punishment and deterrence 

What are the Compoundable Offences under Section 359 of BNSS? 

Offences Compoundable Without Court Permission

Offence 

Section 

Person by Whom Offence May Be Compounded 

Enticing or taking away or detaining with criminal intent a married woman 

84 

The husband of the woman and the woman 

Voluntarily causing hurt 

115(2) 

The person to whom the hurt is caused 

Voluntarily causing hurt on provocation 

122(1) 

The person to whom the hurt is caused 

Voluntarily causing grievous hurt on grave and sudden provocation 

122(2) 

The person to whom the hurt is caused 

Wrongfully restraining or confining any person 

126(2), 127(2) 

The person restrained or confined 

Wrongfully confining a person for three days or more 

127(3) 

The person confined 

Wrongfully confining a person for ten days or more 

127(4) 

The person confined 

Wrongfully confining a person in secret 

127(6) 

The person confined 

Assault or use of criminal force 

131, 133, 136 

The person assaulted or to whom criminal force is used 

Uttering words, etc., with deliberate intent to wound the religious feelings of any person 

302 

The person whose religious feelings are intended to be wounded 

Theft 

303(2) 

The owner of the property stolen 

Dishonest misappropriation of property 

314 

The owner of the property misappropriated 

Criminal breach of trust by a carrier, wharfinger, etc. 

316(3) 

The owner of the property in respect of which the breach of trust has been committed 

Dishonestly receiving stolen property knowing it to be stolen 

317(2) 

The owner of the property stolen 

Assisting in the concealment or disposal of stolen property, knowing it to be stolen 

317(5) 

The owner of the property stolen 

Cheating 

318(2) 

The person cheated 

Cheating by personation 

319(2) 

The person cheated 

Fraudulent removal or concealment of property, etc., to prevent distribution among creditors 

320 

The creditors who are affected thereby 

Fraudulently preventing from being made available for his creditors a debt or demand due to the offender 

321 

The creditors who are affected thereby 

Fraudulent execution of deed of transfer containing false statement of consideration 

322 

The person affected thereby 

Fraudulent removal or concealment of property 

323 

The person affected thereby 

Mischief, when the only loss or damage caused is loss or damage to a private person 

324(2), 324(4) 

The person to whom the loss or damage is caused 

Mischief by killing or maiming animal 

325 

The owner of the animal 

Mischief by injury to works of irrigation by wrongfully diverting water when the only loss or damage caused is loss or damage to private person 

326(a) 

The person to whom the loss or damage is caused 

Criminal trespass 

329(3) 

The person in possession of the property trespassed upon 

House-trespass 

329(4) 

The person in possession of the property trespassed upon 

House-trespass to commit an offence (other than theft) punishable with imprisonment 

332(c) 

The person in possession of the house trespassed upon 

Using a false trade or property mark 

345(3) 

The person to whom loss or injury is caused by such use 

Counterfeiting a property mark used by another 

347(1) 

The person to whom loss or injury is caused by such use 

Selling goods marked with a counterfeit property mark 

349 

The person to whom loss or injury is caused by such use 

Criminal intimidation 

351(2), 351(3) 

The person intimidated 

Insult intended to provoke a breach of peace 

352 

The person insulted 

Inducing person to believe himself an object of divine displeasure 

354 

The person induced 

Defamation (except specified cases) 

356(2) 

The person defamed 

Printing or engraving matter, knowing it to be defamatory 

356(3) 

The person defamed 

Sale of printed or engraved substance containing defamatory matter, knowing it to contain such matter 

356(4) 

The person defamed 

Criminal breach of contract of service 

357 

The person with whom the offender has contracted 

Offences Compoundable with Court Permission 

Offence 

Section 

Person by Whom Offence May Be Compounded 

Word, gesture, or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman 

79 

The woman whom it was intended to insult or whose privacy was intruded upon 

Marrying again during the lifetime of a husband or wife 

82(1) 

The husband or wife of the person so marrying 

Causing miscarriage 

88 

The woman to whom miscarriage is caused 

Voluntarily causing grievous hurt 

117(2) 

The person to whom hurt is caused 

Causing hurt by doing an act so rashly and negligently as to endanger human life or the personal safety of others 

125(a) 

The person to whom hurt is caused 

Causing grievous hurt by doing an act so rashly and negligently as to endanger human life or the personal safety of others 

125(b) 

The person to whom hurt is caused 

Assault or criminal force in attempting wrongfully to confine a person 

135 

The person assaulted or to whom the force was used 

Theft by clerk or servant of property in possession of master 

306 

The owner of the property stolen 

Criminal breach of trust 

316(2) 

The owner of the property in respect of which the breach of trust has been committed 

Criminal breach of trust by a clerk or servant 

316(4) 

The owner of the property in respect of which the breach of trust has been committed 

Cheating a person whose interest the offender was bound, either by law or by legal contract, to protect 

318(3) 

The person cheated 

Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property or the making, alteration, or destruction of a valuable security 

318(4) 

The person cheated 

Defamation against the President, Vice-President, Governor, Administrator, or Minister in respect of public functions when instituted upon a complaint made by the public prosecutor 

356(2) 

The person defamed