Legal Dimensions of Corporate Social Responsibility in India

« »

14-Nov-2024 |

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has been increasingly recognised as a critical part of corporate governance worldwide. In India, CSR has transformed from being voluntary to legally mandated under the Companies Act, 2013. With CSR, businesses are required to fulfill their roles not only as profit-oriented entities but also as societal stakeholders.

In this blog, we will explore CSR, legal evolution of CSR in India, examining its historical context, statutory frameworks, relevant case laws, challenges, and its comparison with global standards. We will also analyze CSR's legal aspects and evaluate the scope for further reforms, focusing on how these dimensions impact both businesses and the broader Indian society.

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

CSR represents a business model in which companies consider the social and environmental impact of their operations, beyond the traditional focus on economic returns. Often referred to as corporate accountability, corporate citizenship, sustainability, or simply corporate responsibility, CSR is increasingly seen as essential in shaping a company’s relationship with society and the environment.

CSR is a self-regulating framework where companies voluntarily uphold ethical standards, sustainability, and transparency. Central to CSR is ethical behavior, which goes beyond legal compliance, emphasizing fair labor, consumer protection, and honest marketing. CSR also focuses on sustainable development, encouraging companies to support community welfare through initiatives in healthcare, education, and social development. Transparency is equally crucial, as it involves openly reporting business practices to build public trust and accountability. Together, these elements guide companies toward responsible practices that benefit society and contribute to sustainable growth.

CSR manifests in various forms, demonstrating different levels of commitment. Philanthropy is a key aspect, where companies engage in charitable giving by donating to nonprofits, matching employee contributions, or organizing fundraising events to support community causes.

Economic responsibility focuses on fair employee treatment, ensuring competitive wages, reducing income disparities, and investing in the local economy, thereby enhancing community well-being.
Additionally, environmental responsibility involves adopting eco-friendly practices, such as reducing carbon footprints and promoting recycling, to minimize environmental impact.

CSR offers multiple benefits to society, the environment, and companies themselves. It enhances a company’s reputation and can help attract, motivate, and retain talent, as employees often prefer working for socially responsible organizations. CSR also serves as a risk management tool, as companies that actively engage in CSR are better positioned to avoid regulatory issues and public criticism.

Two of the primary international standards that shape CSR are the UN Global Compact and the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). The UN Global Compact encourages companies to align their strategies with principles related to human rights, labor, the environment, and anti-corruption, while the GRI provides a framework for companies to report their economic, environmental, and social performance transparently. These standards help companies develop and report CSR activities that are consistent, measurable, and comparable across industries.

Historical Context and Evolution of CSR in India

CSR in India has roots in traditional philanthropy, with business leaders like Jamsetji Tata and G.D. Birla sets examples through significant contributions to social causes. Influenced by Mahatma Gandhi’s concept of trusteeship, these industrialists saw wealth as a resource meant for public welfare. According to the Institute of Corporate Affairs, by the early 20th century, Indian companies were contributing to social causes, primarily through charity and welfare programs.

Global Influence

India's CSR landscape has evolved alongside global developments. Initiatives like the UN Global Compact (2000) and the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) 26000 guidelines (2010) marked a shift towards sustainable and socially responsible business practices. ISO 26000, in particular, laid out guidelines for social responsibility, influencing Indian policy discourse. The World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) defines CSR as “the commitment of business to contribute to sustainable economic development, working with employees, the local community and society at large to improve their quality of life.”

From Voluntary Guidelines to Statutory Mandates

In India, CSR gained policy momentum when the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) issued voluntary guidelines in 2009, urging companies to contribute to social welfare. With the Companies Act, 2013, CSR transitioned to a statutory mandate. India's adoption of mandatory CSR was one of the first globally, indicating a shift from voluntary corporate philanthropy to a compliance-oriented framework.

CSR under the Companies Act, 2013

Under the Companies Act, 2013, Section 135 legally mandates CSR for companies meeting specific financial thresholds. These thresholds include a net worth of INR 500 crore or more, a turnover of INR 1,000 crore or more, or a net profit of INR 5 crore or more. Companies that meet these criteria are required to spend at least 2% of their average net profits from the preceding three financial years on CSR activities.

Section 135 also mandates the formation of a CSR committee by the company’s board, which is responsible for drafting, monitoring, and reporting on CSR policies. The board must detail CSR activities in its annual report, ensuring transparency and accountability.

Schedule VII of the Companies Act provides a broad outline of permissible CSR activities, including initiatives aimed at eradicating hunger and poverty, promoting education and gender equality, supporting environmental sustainability, and preserving national heritage. This list is intentionally broad, allowing companies the flexibility to choose CSR activities that align with their core values and expertise.

Significant amendments, particularly the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2019, and the Companies (CSR Policy) Amendment Rules, 2021, introduced new compliance requirements. If companies fail to spend the prescribed amount on CSR, they are now required to deposit the unspent balance into a government-specified fund, reinforcing the mandatory nature of CSR spending.

Additionally, these amendments allow companies to carry forward unspent CSR funds for “ongoing projects,” thereby encouraging companies to undertake long-term initiatives that have a sustained social impact. Together, these legal provisions mark a progressive shift in Indian corporate law, transitioning CSR from a voluntary initiative to a structured, mandatory requirement with clear regulatory expectations.

Regulation and Oversight Mechanisms

The regulatory landscape for CSR in India involves oversight and enforcement mechanisms by multiple bodies to ensure compliance. The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) plays a central role, requiring companies to submit annual CSR reports that detail their spending and project outcomes.

To enhance transparency and allow public access to CSR data, the MCA launched the National CSR Data Portal in 2018, which provides a comprehensive database of CSR activities and expenditures by Indian companies. Meanwhile, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) oversees the tax treatment of CSR expenses under the Income Tax Act, 1961.
- Unlike most business expenses, CSR spending is generally non-deductible from taxable income, except for certain contributions, such as donations to Swachh Bharat Kosh, which has sparked discussions around expanding tax incentives to encourage genuine CSR investments.
In addition to governmental oversight, Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) often act as key implementation partners for CSR projects, particularly in areas like education, healthcare, and rural development. However, when receiving foreign CSR funds, NGOs must comply with the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA), 2010, to ensure accountability and transparency in the utilization of such funds.
- This regulatory framework underscores India’s approach to CSR, emphasizing both corporate accountability and robust monitoring to foster meaningful social impact.

Case Laws Shaping CSR Jurisprudence

Several key judicial decisions have significantly shaped the jurisprudence of CSR in India, underscoring the role of CSR as a cornerstone of corporate governance. In the case of Tata Power Company Ltd. v. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (2008), the court emphasized the social responsibilities of corporations, ruling that CSR is integral to corporate governance. This landmark judgment affirmed the idea that companies should not only focus on profits but also contribute to social welfare, thereby reinforcing CSR as a duty within corporate operations.

Further advancing this notion, the case of Vivek Ranjan Sriram v. Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) (2019) addressed CSR compliance within regulated sectors, such as the insurance industry. Here, the court underscored CSR as a fundamental part of the ethical framework guiding businesses, emphasizing that CSR obligations apply consistently across sectors, even those with stringent regulatory oversight. This decision reinforced that ethical obligations, including CSR, are not separate from core business practices but are deeply intertwined with corporate governance and regulatory compliance.

Another influential case, Binani Cement Ltd. v. Srei Equipment Finance Ltd. & Ors (2018), examined CSR obligations within the context of corporate insolvency proceedings. The Supreme Court, in this instance, underscored CSR’s critical role in corporate governance by interpreting CSR duties as inseparable from the corporate entity itself, even amid financial distress. This case thus reinforced the judiciary’s view that CSR commitments should not be disregarded due to insolvency, affirming the idea that corporate responsibility to society endures regardless of a company’s financial circumstances. Together, these cases illustrate the judiciary’s evolving view on CSR, reinforcing its status as a mandatory and inextricable aspect of corporate identity in India.

Challenges

The legal framework for CSR in India, while groundbreaking, faces several significant challenges and criticisms that hinder its effectiveness and impact. One of the primary issues lies in the implementation and compliance of CSR obligations. Identifying impactful projects that align with both company goals and community needs can be challenging due to ambiguities in guidelines and a lack of clear project categorisation. As a result, some companies engage in “tokenism” or adopt superficial CSR initiatives to meet the minimum legal requirements and avoid penalties rather than fostering genuine social change.

According to KPMG’s CSR Survey, only 54% of eligible companies fully complied with the CSR mandate by investing the required amount, indicating substantial gaps in sincere CSR implementation.

Another key challenge is the lack of tax incentives for CSR spending. Under the Income Tax Act, CSR expenses are generally non-deductible, except in certain cases, like contributions to Swachh Bharat Kosh. This lack of tax deductibility creates a disincentive, particularly for companies seeking meaningful impact through costly, long-term projects. The Indian Institute of Corporate Affairs has recommended allowing deductions for specific CSR expenses to incentivize businesses and encourage deeper engagement in social initiatives, though this reform remains pending.

Monitoring and reporting also pose significant hurdles to CSR effectiveness. While the National CSR Data Portal introduced by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs has improved transparency, allowing public access to CSR spending records, there is still limited independent or third-party auditing of CSR activities. This gap reduces the effectiveness of monitoring mechanisms and makes it challenging to hold companies accountable for CSR spending that might lack substantial social impact.

Finally, there are criticisms regarding the actual social impact and effectiveness of mandatory CSR laws. Many experts argue that CSR obligations should move beyond being a regulatory formality to encompass broader Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and encourage sustainable, innovative business practices. Current mandates sometimes lead companies to focus on short-term financial contributions rather than creating lasting social change. To achieve meaningful impact, many believe that CSR regulations should evolve to incentivize corporations to adopt a holistic approach to social responsibility that aligns with Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) standards. These challenges underscore the need for further reforms in India’s CSR framework to better align corporate initiatives with sustainable development goals, enhance accountability, and promote genuine social change.

Comparative Analysis

CSR laws vary significantly across countries, reflecting distinct approaches to corporate accountability and social impact. India’s CSR mandate under the Companies Act, 2013 stands out globally, requiring companies above certain financial thresholds to spend 2% of net profits on CSR activities. This mandatory model emphasizes direct contributions to social welfare but faces challenges with ensuring meaningful impact.

In the United Kingdom, CSR is largely voluntary but supported by the Companies Act, 2006 and the UK Corporate Governance Code, which encourage companies to consider environmental and social impacts under the “enlightened shareholder value” principle. The UK’s approach promotes CSR as part of good governance rather than through strict mandates.

The European Union employs a disclosure-based model under the CSR Directive (2014/95/EU), requiring large companies to report on social and environmental practices. This focus on transparency encourages corporate responsibility without mandating specific expenditures.

In the United States, CSR remains voluntary and is driven by ESG standards. Companies report CSR activities through frameworks like the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), aiming to attract socially-conscious investors.

These differing approaches reflect each region’s regulatory priorities. While India enforces mandatory CSR spending, the UK, EU, and US favor voluntary or reporting-based strategies, each contributing to a global push for sustainable and ethical business practices.

Future Prospects and Reforms

The future of CSR law in India points toward exciting and potentially transformative reforms, aiming to enhance both its impact and alignment with global standards. As CSR evolves, three key trends stand out: integrating ESG principles, leveraging digital tools for transparency, and expanding CSR to include Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs).

Integrating ESG into CSR Frameworks

Across the globe, CSR is evolving into broader ESG frameworks, which emphasize sustainability and ethical practices across all facets of business. India is exploring ways to integrate ESG into its CSR policies, which would encourage companies to adopt practices that align not only with social goals but also with environmental and governance standards.This integration could bridge CSR with global benchmarks like the United Nations SDGs and improve India’s position in global sustainability rankings. By incorporating ESG, Indian CSR policies can inspire companies to address long-term challenges, such as climate change, ethical governance, and social equity, within their operational structures.

Digital Transformation and Transparency

Digital tools, including blockchain and data analytics, offer potential advancements in CSR monitoring, making it easier to track, report, and verify CSR spending in real-time. Blockchain, for example, could offer secure and transparent records of CSR activities, which would ensure that funds reach the intended projects without discrepancies. Real-time data collection can also facilitate immediate feedback, allowing companies to adapt projects to stakeholder needs effectively. By enhancing transparency, these digital innovations could improve public trust in CSR and hold companies accountable for genuine social impact.

Incentivizing CSR in Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)

Currently, India’s CSR laws mainly apply to large companies with high net worth and profit thresholds. This limitation excludes many small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which, though smaller in scale, collectively have significant potential to contribute to social development.

Experts recommend introducing voluntary or incentivized CSR frameworks for SMEs to encourage their participation in community welfare and sustainability initiatives without regulatory pressure. With suitable incentives, SMEs could contribute significantly to CSR goals, expanding socially responsible practices across industries.

These reforms, alongside integrating ESG principles and digital transparency, could make India’s CSR approach more comprehensive and impactful, aligning with global trends to promote sustainable development and responsible corporate governance.

Conclusion

The legal framework for CSR in India underscores the importance of corporate accountability and ethical business conduct. While CSR was historically a voluntary exercise, its statutory mandate reflects a shift toward a more structured approach.

As CSR intersects with ESG, digital transformation, and sustainability goals, it represents a vital aspect of modern corporate law. With continued refinement and regulatory support, CSR laws in India can significantly impact social and economic development, fostering responsible corporate citizenship and contributing meaningfully to India’s growth narrative.

References: