Three Years of Court Practice for Judiciary Exams: Challenge or Opportunity?

    «

   21-Mar-2025 | Drishti The Vision



The landscape of judicial recruitment in India is evolving, particularly concerning the requirement of practical legal experience for aspiring judges. Recent developments, such as the Supreme Court's halt of the Gujarat Judicial Recruitment process, have brought significant attention to the necessity of legal practice before entering the judiciary. This blog explores the implications of these changes and how Drishti Judiciary can assist aspirants in navigating this complex terrain. 

Background of the Recruitment Process 

On 18th March, 2025, the Supreme Court intervened in the recruitment process for Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC) and Civil Judge-Junior Division positions in Gujarat. The Gujarat High Court had issued a notification allowing candidates to apply without specifying a minimum number of years of legal practice. This raised concerns about the preparedness of fresh graduates for judicial responsibilities. 

Importance of Legal Practice 

Legal practice provides essential skills and insights into courtroom procedures, client interactions, and case management. The Supreme Court's deliberation on whether to reinstate a three-year practice requirement highlights the ongoing debate about the qualifications necessary for effective judicial performance. 

State-Specific Cases and Their Impact 

  • Gujarat:  
    • The Supreme Court's stay on recruitment emphasizes that candidates must possess adequate legal experience to ensure competent judicial appointments. 
  • Madhya Pradesh:  
    • The High Court upheld amendments requiring either three years of practice or exceptional academic performance (70% marks) for Civil Judge positions, reflecting a trend towards balancing practical experience with academic excellence. 
  • Karnataka:  
    • Similar discussions are ongoing regarding minimum practice requirements, showcasing a nationwide reassessment of judicial qualifications. 
  • Himachal Pradesh:  
    • On 20th March 2025, the High Court of Himachal Pradesh has also decided to put on hold the ongoing recruitment process for the posts of Civil Judge keeping in view the pending Writ Petition(s) Civil No(s). 1022/1989, titled All India Judges Association & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.  

What if Three Years of Practice Becomes Mandatory? 

While the prospect of mandatory practice may seem daunting, it also presents an opportunity for growth. Embrace this phase as a chance to deepen your understanding of law and develop skills that will serve you well throughout your career. Remember, every challenge is a stepping stone toward success. If the Supreme Court mandates a compulsory three-year legal practice, judiciary aspirants must modify their preparation strategies accordingly. Here’s how you can turn this challenge into an opportunity: 

1. Practical Courtroom Experience – A Stepping Stone, Not a Hurdle: 

  • Engage in internships at law firms, district courts, and High Courts. 
  • Work under senior advocates to gain hands-on exposure to trial proceedings. 
  • Learn drafting, case analysis, and court procedure, which will enhance Mains answer writing. 

2. Balancing Court Practice with Judiciary Preparation: 

  • Time Management: Dedicate mornings to court practice and evenings/nights for judicial studies. 
  • Enroll in Judiciary Coaching: Opt for flexible learning modules like Drishti Judiciary. Their foundation courses provide comprehensive preparation tailored to meet the evolving demands of judiciary exams. 
  • Smart Study Techniques: Use concise notes, case law summaries, and mock tests to optimize study hours. 
    • At Drishti Judiciary, we recognize the challenges aspirants face in balancing court practice with competitive exam preparation. Our specially designed Bilingual: 
      • Comprehensive Study Material & Notes – Covers bare acts, case laws, and judgment analysis 
      • Answer Writing & Judgment Writing Practice – Essential for Mains preparation 
      • Mock Tests & Personalized Mentorship – Ensures structured preparation 
    • With Drishti Judiciary, aspirants can efficiently navigate the three-year practice requirement while staying on track to qualify for the judiciary exams. 

3. Building Strong Legal Concepts: 

  • Court practice strengthens understanding of Evidence Law, CrPC, CPC, and IPC—all crucial for judicial exams. 
  • Observing courtroom arguments improves articulation skills, beneficial for Mains and Interview rounds. 

Additional Suggestions for Aspirants 

  • Stay Informed: Regularly follow updates from state high courts and the Supreme Court regarding recruitment policies. 
  • Focus on Practical Experience: Engage in internships or clerkships to gain hands-on experience in legal settings. 
  • Participate in Mock Trials: Join workshops or training sessions that simulate courtroom experiences to build confidence and competence. 
  • Network with Professionals: Connect with practicing lawyers and judges for insights into the profession and guidance on career paths. 
  • Utilize Resources Wisely: Leverage study materials, online courses, and past examination papers available through Drishti Judiciary to enhance your preparation. 

Conclusion 

The evolving requirements for judicial appointments underscore the importance of practical legal experience alongside academic qualifications. As aspirants navigate these changes, Drishti Judiciary stands ready to support them with tailored coaching and resources. By focusing on both theoretical knowledge and practical skills, students can effectively prepare for all states judiciary exams and emerge as competent candidates ready to serve in India's judiciary.