Home / Current Affairs

Intellectual Property Right

Written Power of Attorney Cannot Be Revoked or Altered Through Oral Statements

    «
 28-Apr-2026

    Tags:
  • Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (TOPA)

"A document which, for its validity or effectiveness is required by law to be in writing, no modification or alteration or substitution of such written document is permissible by parol evidence and it is only by another written document that the terms of earlier written document can be altered, rescinded or substituted." 

Justice Rekha Borana 

Source: Rajasthan High Court 

Why in News? 

Justice Rekha Borana of the Rajasthan High Court, in the case of Smt. Champa Devi v.   Jogaram and Anr. (2026), held that a written power of attorney cannot be revoked, modified, or substituted through oral statements. The court further held that where a right is transferred by a written document, its revocation must also be in writing and must be communicated to the party in whose favour the right was conferred. Applying these principles, the court allowed the petitioner's application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and rejected the plaint as frivolous and vexatious. 

What was the Background of Smt. Champa Devi v. Jogaram and Anr. (2026) Case? 

  • In 2012, the respondent-plaintiff (Jogaram) entered into a development agreement with the petitioner Champa Devi and one Anil Kaushik, who were developers. Under the agreement, the plaintiff executed power of attorneys in their favour to convert his land from agricultural to residential use.  
  • The developers were to bear all expenses, and in return, 13 bighas out of the total 27 bighas of land were to be transferred to them as consideration. 
  • In 2021, the plaintiff alleged that no development work had been undertaken. He claimed to have orally revoked the POA in January 2022.  
  • In October 2023, the petitioner executed a sale deed in favour of one Geegaram. The plaintiff subsequently issued a formal registered notice of revocation of the POA in November 2023 and thereafter challenged the sale deed on the ground that it had been executed fraudulently, despite the alleged oral revocation. 
  • The petitioner filed an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC before the trial court seeking rejection of the plaint, which was dismissed. The petitioner then approached the Rajasthan High Court in revision. 

What were the Court's Observations? 

The court made the following key observations: 

Oral Revocation of a Written POA Is of No Legal Consequence: 

  • A contract or disposition required to be in writing, and which has been reduced to writing, cannot have its terms modified, altered, or substituted by an oral contract or disposition. 
  • No parol evidence is admissible to substantiate such an oral contract or disposition. 
  • Relying on the Supreme Court's ruling in S. Saktivel (Dead) by LRs v. M. Venugopal Pillai & Ors. (2000), the court reiterated that only another written document can alter, rescind, or substitute the terms of an earlier written document. 

Revocation of a Written Instrument Must Be in Writing and Communicated: 

  • Where any right is transferred through a written document, the revocation of that document must also be in writing. 
  • Such revocation or cancellation must be brought to the notice of the party in whose favour the right was conferred. 
  • The alleged oral revocation of the POA in January 2022 was therefore of no legal consequence. 

Sale Deed Was Valid as POA Stood Unrevoked at the Time of Execution: 

  • The court noted that the trial court had erroneously recorded the date of execution of the sale deed as 03.11.2023, when in fact the sale deed was executed on 31.10.2023. 
  • The date 03.11.2023 was merely the date of registration of the sale deed, not its execution. 
  • Since the POA had not been validly revoked as on 31.10.2023, the sale deed executed on that date was perfectly valid. 
  • The formal written notice of revocation was only issued on 02.11.2023 — after the sale deed had already been executed. 

Plaint Liable to Be Rejected Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC: 

  • The execution of the POA and the development agreement on 05.12.2012 was an admitted fact, not disputed by the plaintiff. 
  • Given the settled legal position on oral revocation and the validity of the sale deed, the court found the suit to be frivolous and vexatious. 
  • The court allowed the petitioner's Order VII Rule 11 CPC application and rejected the plaint. 

What is the Power of Attorney? 

Definition and Basic Concept: 

  • A Power of Attorney (POA) or letter of attorney is a written authorisation to represent or act on another's behalf in private affairs (financial or health-related), business, or other legal matters.  
  • The person authorising another to act is called the principal, grantor, or donor. The one authorised to act is the agent, attorney, or attorney-in-fact.  
  • As an agent, an attorney-in-fact is a fiduciary for the principal — the law requires complete honesty and loyalty toward the principal.  

Formal Requirements: 

  • For a POA to be a legally enforceable document, at a minimum it must be signed and dated by the principal.  
  • Some jurisdictions require that a POA be witnessed, notarised, or both. Even when not required, notarisation increases the likelihood of withstanding a legal challenge.  
  • Many institutions such as hospitals, banks, and the IRS require a POA to be in writing before they will honour it.  
  • The equal dignity rule requires that the authorisation for someone performing certain acts on another's behalf must have been given with the same formality as required for the act itself — for example, a POA to sell real property must itself be in writing. 

Mental Capacity Requirement: 

  • A person can only create a POA if they have the requisite mental capacity at the time of execution.  
  • If a person is already incapacitated, it is not possible for them to execute a valid POA; the only alternative may be a court-imposed conservatorship or guardianship.  

Types of Power of Attorney: 

  • Special (Limited) POA — Limited to a specified act or type of act only.  
  • General POA — Allows the agent to make all personal and business decisions on behalf of the principal.  
  • Temporary POA — One with a limited time frame.  
  • Durable/Lasting/Enduring POA — The principal specifies that the POA will continue to be effective even if the grantor becomes incapacitated. Authority continues until the grantor's death or the POA is revoked.  
  • Springing POA — A power that takes effect only after the incapacity of the grantor or some other definite future act or circumstance; it cannot be invoked before that triggering event.  
  • Health Care POA — Gives the attorney-in-fact lasting authority to make health-care decisions for the grantor, up to and including terminating care and life support. It is also referred to as a "health care proxy."