- Books & Magazines
- Login
- Language: Eng हिंदी
Home / Company Law
Civil Law
Company vs. LLP
«17-Apr-2026
Introduction
Both a company and a Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) are separate legal entities created by law, enjoying perpetual succession and the capacity to sue and be sued in their own names. However, they are governed by distinct statutes — the Companies Act, 2013 and the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 respectively — and differ considerably in their structural framework, compliance requirements, and internal governance.
Difference between Company and LLP
|
Parameter |
Company |
LLP |
|
Governing Law |
Companies Act, 2013 |
Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 |
|
Charter Document |
Memorandum and Articles of Association |
LLP Agreement |
|
Common Seal |
Mandatory; every company must have one |
Optional; depends on the LLP Agreement |
|
Number of Members/Partners |
Private: 2–50; Public: minimum 7 |
Minimum 2; no upper limit |
|
Liability |
Limited to unpaid amount on shares |
Limited to capital contribution, except in cases of intentional fraud or wrongful acts |
|
Transfer of Interest |
Freely transferable |
Governed by the LLP Agreement |
|
Statutory Meetings |
Board Meetings and General Meetings are mandatory |
No statutory requirement for meetings |
|
Minutes |
Mandatory recording of proceedings |
Optional; only if agreed upon in the LLP Agreement |
|
Annual Filing |
Annual Financial Statement + Annual Return filed with ROC |
Annual Statement of Accounts, Solvency Statement + Annual Return filed with Registrar |
|
Audit |
Mandatory annual audit under Companies Act, 2013 |
Mandatory only if turnover exceeds ₹40 lakh or contribution exceeds ₹25 lakh |
|
Accounting Standards |
Mandatory compliance |
Rules not yet issued; not mandatorily applicable |
|
Identification Number |
Directors require Director Identification Number (DIN) |
Designated Partners require Designated Partner Identification Number (DPIN) |
|
Remuneration to Managerial Personnel |
Subject to legal restrictions under the Companies Act |
As per the LLP Agreement; no statutory cap |
|
Contracts with Directors/Partners |
Restrictions apply on certain specified contracts in which directors are interested |
Partners are free to enter into any contract without such restrictions |
|
Oppression & Mismanagement |
Statutory remedy available under the Companies Act |
No such provision exists under the LLP Act |
|
Whistle Blowing |
No provision under the Companies Act, 2013 |
Protection provided to employees and partners who furnish information during investigation |
|
Creditworthiness |
Highest, owing to stringent compliance and disclosure norms |
Comparatively higher than a partnership, but lower than a company |
|
Merger/Amalgamation |
Can enter into compromise, arrangements, merger, or amalgamation |
Can enter into compromise, arrangements, merger, or amalgamation |
Conclusion
While both a company and an LLP offer the twin advantages of separate legal personality and limited liability, they cater to different organisational needs. A company, with its rigorous statutory framework, mandatory audits, and structured governance, is suited to larger enterprises requiring high creditworthiness and public participation. An LLP, by contrast, offers greater operational flexibility and reduced compliance burden, making it preferable for professional services and smaller ventures.
