Home / Current Affairs

Constitutional Law

NCSC Has No Adjudicatory Role

    «    »
 29-Jul-2026

    Tags:
  • Constitution of India, 1950 (COI)

Mumbai Port Authority v. National Commission for Scheduled Caste & Ors. 

"NCSC and its other compatriots under Articles 338A and 338B are Constitutional Bodies with a socially beneficent purpose but quite apparently, the Legislature has prescribed a role that is recommendatory and advisory, but certainly not adjudicatory." 

Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice Augustine George Masih

Source: Supreme Court 

Why in News? 

A Bench of Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice Augustine George Masih, in Mumbai Port Authority v. National Commission for Scheduled Caste & Ors. (2026), held that the National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC) does not possess adjudicatory powers and can only investigate, record findings, and recommend action to the appropriate government, while setting aside a Bombay High Court judgment that had upheld an NCSC order directing payment of arrears in a seniority-related service dispute. 

What was the Background of Mumbai Port Authority v. NCSC (2026) Case? 

  • Respondent No. 3, a Scheduled Caste employee of the Mumbai Port Authority, was promoted pursuant to a 2002 Office Memorandum (OM) on seniority, which had superseded an earlier 1997 OM. 
  • In 2016, the Bombay High Court quashed the 2002 OM, following which the Authority recast seniority in accordance with the 1997 OM and consequently demoted Respondent No. 3 in 2020. 
  • Aggrieved, she approached the NCSC, which in 2024 directed her reinstatement along with payment of arrears. 
  • The Authority's challenge to the NCSC order was dismissed by the Bombay High Court in a writ petition, leading to an appeal before the Supreme Court. 

What were the Court's Observations? 

  • On the nature of NCSC's constitutional role: The Court observed that NCSC and other similar bodies under Articles 338A and 338B, though constitutional bodies with a socially beneficent purpose, have been assigned a role by the Legislature that is recommendatory and advisory, and not adjudicatory. 
  • On the precedent governing NCSC's powers: The Court relied on All India Indian Overseas Bank SC and ST Employees' Welfare Assn. v. Union of India, (1996) 6 SCC 606, where it had earlier been held that the powers flowing to the NCSC's predecessor body under Article 338 were confined to investigating and inquiring into matters concerning Scheduled Castes, and did not extend to passing adjudicatory orders. 
  • On the limits of NCSC's fact-finding power: The Court clarified that while NCSC has the power to requisition documents and receive evidence, it does not have the corresponding power to pass an order giving effect to that evidence; it may only record a factual finding and thereafter call upon the concerned Central or State Government to act upon it. 
  • On the meaning of "safeguards" under Article 338(5): Rejecting NCSC's contention that the term "safeguards" carries an enforcement function under sub-article (5), the Court held that the provision confers a power to inquire into deprivation of rights and safeguards of Scheduled Castes, which is recommendatory at best and does not confer adjudicatory authority. 
  • On the validity of the impugned order: The Court held that the NCSC's direction for payment of arrears was contrary to the constitutional scheme and therefore non-est in law. 
  • On relief granted: The appeal filed by the Mumbai Port Authority was allowed, and the NCSC order along with the Bombay High Court judgment upholding it were set aside. 

What is the National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC)? 

About: 

  • The NCSC is a Constitutional Body established with a view to provide safeguards against the exploitation of Scheduled Castes and to promote and protect their social, educational, economic and cultural interests. 

History: 

  • Special Officer:  
    • Initially, the Constitution provided for the appointment of a Special Officer under Article 338. The Special Officer was designated as the Commissioner for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. 
  • 65th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1990:  
    • It amended Article 338 of the Constitution and replaced the one-member system with a multi-member National Commission for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST). 
  • 89th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2003:  
    • Article 338 was amended, and the erstwhile National Commission for SC and ST was replaced by two separate Commissions from the year 2004, which were:  
      • National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC) under Article 338. 
      • National Commission for Scheduled Tribes (NCST) under Article 338A. 

Composition: 

  • The NCSC comprises a Chairperson, a Vice-Chairperson, and three additional Members. 
  • These positions are filled through the President's appointment, indicated by a warrant under his hand and seal.  
    • Their conditions of service and tenure of office are also determined by the President.