-
- Books & Magazines
- Login
- Language: Eng हिंदी
Home / Current Affairs
Civil Law
Permanent Lok Adalat has no Jurisdiction Over Service Matters
« »15-Sep-2026
Rajasthan High Court
Why in News?
Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand, in State of Rajasthan v. Bhanwar Lal Jain (2026), set aside an award passed by the Permanent Lok Adalat (PLA), Merta, Nagaur, holding that the PLA lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate a dispute concerning grant of service benefits, as such a dispute did not fall within the meaning of "public utility services" under Section 22A(b) of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.
What was the Background of State of Rajasthan v. Bhanwar Lal Jain (2026) Case?
- The respondent was appointed as a Helper on a temporary basis in 1978, and was declared a semi-permanent employee in 1980.
- However, for the purpose of all service benefits, his services were counted only from September 1981.
- Aggrieved, the respondent approached the Permanent Lok Adalat, Merta, Nagaur, seeking service benefits from the initial date of his appointment.
- The PLA allowed the application and decided the matter in the respondent's favour, directing the Public Health Engineering Department to grant service benefits from 1978.
- The petitioner-department challenged the maintainability of the application before the Rajasthan High Court, contending that since the issue related to grant of service benefits, it could not have been adjudicated by the PLA.
What were the Court's Observations?
- On the Limited Jurisdiction of the Permanent Lok Adalat:
The Court observed that the purpose of establishing a Permanent Lok Adalat is to exercise limited jurisdiction over one or more public utility services, and not otherwise. - On the Scope of "Public Utility Services" under Section 22A(b):
The Court noted that the categories of public utility services have been specifically enumerated under the Act, with power vested in the Central or State Government to expand the definition to include any other service, indicating a deliberately confined jurisdiction. - On the Interpretation of "Any Party to a Dispute" under Section 22C:
The Court held that this phrase must be read in the context of the jurisdiction for which the Permanent Lok Adalat has been established, and cannot be read to extend the PLA's authority beyond public utility service disputes. - On Service Benefit Disputes Falling Outside PLA's Purview:
The Court held that since the matter pertained to grant of service benefits to the respondent, it did not fall under the purview of "public utility services" as defined under Section 22A(b), and the PLA had therefore exercised power not vested in it. - In view of the above, the Court quashed the award passed by the PLA, granting the respondent liberty to file a representation before the petitioner-department, which was directed to hear and decide the matter sympathetically and expeditiously, preferably within two months.
What are Permanent Lok Adalats?
About Lok Adalats:
|
Introduction |
|
|
First Lok Adalat |
|
|
Statutory Recognition |
|
|
Organization |
|
|
Composition |
|
|
Jurisdiction |
|
|
Proceedings |
|
|
Awards |
|
|
Benefits |
|
Permanent Lok Adalats:
About:
The Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 was amended in 2002 to provide for the establishment of the Permanent Lok Adalats to deal with cases pertaining to the public utility services like transport, postal, telegraph etc.
Essential Features:
- These have been set up as permanent bodies under Section 22-B of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.
- It shall consist of a Chairman who is or has been a district judge or additional district judge or has held judicial office higher in rank than that of the district judge and two other persons having adequate experience in public utility services.
- It shall not have jurisdiction in respect of any matter relating to an offence not compoundable under any law. The jurisdiction of the Permanent Lok Adalats is upto Rs. 1 Crore.
- The award of the Permanent Lok Adalat is final and binding upon the parties.
- Before the dispute is brought before any court, any party to the dispute may make an application to the Permanent Lok Adalat for settlement of the dispute. After an application is made to the Permanent Lok Adalat, no party to that application shall invoke jurisdiction of any court in the same dispute.
